Re: cdrom / cdwriter mouting problem
On Fri, 2002-08-09 at 17:16, csj wrote:
> On 09 Aug 2002 13:00:02 -0400
> Scott Henson <shenson2@sandm.hn.org> wrote:
>
> > > I heard packet writing may be supported in kernel 2.6. I don't know
> > > about reading packet written cdrw, though. You could try some
> > > "close CD" or "make CD readable in other drives" feature in your
> > > windoze app.
> >
> > Well there is also experimental packet writing support in
> > 2.4.20-pre1-ac1 I just noticed it when I was compiling a new kernel
> > yesterday. It is listed under udf file system. The UDF read support
> > is listed as new and the UDF write support is listed as experimental
> > and dangerous. Im not sure what its dangerous to. It could be just
> > that your wasting cd-rs or that you might kill your cd-rw. I dont
> > know which, but Im thinking when I get a new batch of cd-r's in Im
> > going to test out this UDF.
>
> UDF doesn't necessarily mean packet writing.
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
CONFIG_UDF_FS: This is the new file system used on some CD-ROMs and DVDs. Say Y if you intend to mount DVD discs or CDRW's written in packet mode, or if written to by other UDF utilities, such as DirectCD. This UDF file system support is read-only. If you want to write to UDF file systems on some media, you need to say Y to "UDF read-write support" below in addition. Please read Documentation/filesystems/udf.txt. This file system support is also available as a module ( = code which can be inserted in and removed from the running kernel whenever you want). The module is called udf.o. If you want to compile it as a module, say M here and read Documentation/modules.txt. If unsure, say N.
--
-Peace kid
Scott Henson shenson2@wvu.edu
"God's the ultimate playa, so naturally He's going to have some haters,"
rapper Ice Cube said. "But these haters need to realize that if you
mess with the man upstairs, you will get your ass smote. True dat."
Reply to: