[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: _X11TransSocketINETConnect: Can't connect: errno = 111



Thanks for the suggestion Steve, but it didn't
work. The problem turned out to be something
completely different - gdm starts the X server
with "-nolisten tcp". Removing this from
/etc/gdm/gdm.conf fixed the problem.

I tried your suggestion anyway, setting
"ForwardX11 yes" in $HOME/.ssh/config as
documented in the ssh man page, and doing
ssh -X scorpio.
This didn't work as expected (DISPLAY on scorpio
is scorpio:10.0 instead of orion:something),
probably some other config parameter needs to
be set, but I didn't investigate further
because my basic problem is solved. Orion
is not exposed to the internet, so I don't really
need any security.
Thanks for your suggestion anyway,
Nick
--- Stephen Gran <gashuffer09@comcast.net> wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, njacobs@yahoo.com said:
> > 
> > --- Burkhard Ritter <burkhard@sportident.de> wrote:
> > > On Sat, 3 Aug 2002 njacobs@yahoo.com wrote:
> > (...)
> > > i had the same problem. look at
> /etc/X11/Xwrapper.config.
> > > there is an
> > > entry allowd_users. set it to anybody. that might
> help.
> > > but i am not sure,
> > > if this was all i had done.
> > 
> > AFAIK the allowed_users entry in
> /etc/X11/Xwrapper.config
> > just specifies who may start the X server. But in
> > my case, the X server is already running, I just
> > can't connect to it from another machine.
> > (I tried your suggestion anyway, no success.)
> Can you ssh -X scorpio?  You may have to set
> X11Forwarding yes in your
> sshd_config to allow it, but I think the general
> reecommendation is that
> X forwarding via ssh is the safer way to do it.
> HTH,
> Steve
> -- 
> Not drinking, chasing women, or doing drugs won't make
> you live longer --
> it just seems that way.
> 

> ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature 



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
http://health.yahoo.com



Reply to: