Re: Spam Filtering (was Re: Searching for Paul Johnson)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 08:36:39AM -0500, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> This is actually a very good reason for using Spam Assassin. By default
> it's rules and criteria catch >95% of all the spam sent to my account, and
> I've seen <1% false positives. All of which can be dealt with very
> easily.
Spam assassin happens after RBL rejections. Why waste processor
resources when it's coming from a source known to send unacceptably
high levels of spam?
- --
Baloo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9SRcwNtWkM9Ny9xURAhb9AKCgibZBkbEl31e7XBWTRN3TssGf/wCfdvEH
PAK+A/mqLoUlKIsztSYQ9pI=
=q3GY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: