Re: please kindly get back to me
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 05:59:29PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 05:55:50PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 05:54:37PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 11:32:59AM -0500, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> > > > However, as I've stated before messages such as these should be filtered
> > > > by the list itself
> > >
> > > The lists *are* filtered with SpamAssassin.
> >
> > Actually, hmm, let me take that back. Some lists are - it appears -user
> > currently isn't.
>
> ... and I'll change my mind again. :)
>
> debian-user is filtered with SpamAssassin. However, posts from
> subscribers aren't filtered, presumably to ease CPU load on the list
> machine. This confused me to start with because I couldn't see the
> X-Spam-Status: header I expected.
Curious. I've seen X-Spam-Status headers on every debian-user email
I've checked. For example, the post from Colin I just replied to had ...
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-102.0 required=4.7
tests=IN_REP_TO,USER_IN_WHITELIST
+version=2.01
Is there not SpamAssasin checks done on each debian-user email?
- Chris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: