Re: Network problem/question.
10./24 for my subnet. I can't get this to work
properly. I was told that the w2kas is running
something that keeps the shares hidden but allows
mapping the other windows clients to the shares,
however, I'm still unable to do this. I think it
may be a w2k specific problem. I've tried compiling
a new Samba 2.0.7 with the nbfw patch but the
debian/rules binary seems to have some problem and
won't make the packages, and I'm out of time. I
guess it's windows at work and Linux at home.
thanks,
tony
Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2002-05-20 at 13:27, tony mollica wrote:
> > Ron Johnson wrote:
> >
> > > So the rest of the company needs to see win2000server?
> >
> > Yes. I was issued this box, instructed to plug it in and
> > then don't touch it. This should get interesting as a
> > windows setup administered from the Company side. It has
> > one shared directory with some database files that need
> > to be accessed and updated from the LAN side, and accessed
> > for viewing from the WAN side.
>
> Blech... Is the rest of the company on the 10./8 network?
>
> > > On Mon, 2002-05-20 at 10:58, tony mollica wrote:
> > > > The entire operation is behind a company firewall but
> > > > the local management doesn't want other company locations
> > > > browsing our LAN. (Updated drawing below). I have a few
> > > > more days to make this work, at which time the whole location
> > > > will be changed to the assigned subnet (10.x.x.x).
> > >
> >
> > >
> > > > Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > > > How are you securing the win2000server against The Bad Guys?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 2002-05-20 at 02:11, tony mollica wrote:
> > > > > > To answer your question, on the WAN side, the router and
> > > > > > the win2000server have static addresses assigned by the
> > > > > > maintainer of the WAN. The IP of eth1 on the Linux box is
> > > > > > assigned from the same subnet by me.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm using ipchains on the Linux box and I'm still somewhat
> > > > > > unclear on what you propose below. I need to do more reading
> > > >
> > > > > >Hello. I have a mixed network of Linux (Debian) and windows
> > > > > >machines in the arrangement below.
> > > > ______
> > > > | |
> > > > |w2kas |
> > > > |______|
> > > > |
> > > > _______ __|___ ______ ______
> > > > | | | | | | | |
> > > > --->|router |----|switch|----| Linux|----|switch|
> > > > T1 |_______| |______| |______| |______|
> > > > | |
> > > > 10.x.x.x/24 eth1 - eth0 |__191.168.x.x
> > > > WAN IP Masq Machine LAN
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Real IP addresses on the router side with the
> > > > > >192.168.x.x on the switch side. I need to put
> > > > > >a another box on the router side but still
> > > > > >have the internal LAN clients access this
> > > > > >computer from the inside. The new computer
> > > > > >is required to be windows, and there will be
> > > > > >only windows clients accessing it.
>
> --
> +---------------------------------------------------------+
> | Ron Johnson, Jr. Home: ron.l.johnson@cox.net |
> | Jefferson, LA USA http://ronandheather.dhs.org:81 |
> | |
> | "I have created a government of whirled peas..." |
> | Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, 12-May-2002, |
> ! CNN, Larry King Live |
> +---------------------------------------------------------+
--
tony mollica
tmollica@silcom.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: