also sprach martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net> [2002.05.06.2302 +0200]:
> 212.54.xxx.12 <router> 192.168.14.1
> |
> |
> |
> 192.168.14.31 <fw> 192.168.31.1
> |
> |
> |
> host> 192.168.31.2
oh, and before i forget,
192.168.31.2 can ping any of the one-legged hosts in 192.168.14.0/24.
192.168.31.2 can *not* ping any other fw like 192.168.14.31 in
192.168.14.0/24, even though the fw allows icmp ping requests.
(the fw's are fw-1's on windoze, so debugging's like impossible)
192.168.14.17 and any other host on 192.168.14.0/24 can not ping
192.168.14.1 with the static routes in place. if i remove the
static routes on the router, then everything's fine.
this looks to me like a massive linux routing problem, or i really
screwed up (which is hard to imagine for i've done this things many
times before).
the router is debian woody, custom 2.4.18 kernel with HTB+IMQ (QoS)
patches.
--
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
\____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; net@madduck
"women love us for our defects.
if we have enough of them,
they will forgive us everything,
even our gigantic intellects."
-- oscar wilde
Attachment:
pgph6VotJt3id.pgp
Description: PGP signature