Unidentified subject!

 <edwards@icantbelieveimdoingthis.com>  Mon May  6 15:22:49 2002
X-Envelope-Sender: edwards@icantbelieveimdoingthis.com
Received: (qmail 19356 invoked from network); 6 May 2002 20:22:49 -0000
Received: from edwardsa-dsl.thuntek.net (HELO buckhill.icantbelieveimdoingthis.com) (206.206.97.132)
  by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 6 May 2002 20:22:49 -0000
Received: from theory ([192.168.1.2] helo=icantbelieveimdoingthis.com)
	by buckhill.icantbelieveimdoingthis.com with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 174olm-0004id-00; Mon, 06 May 2002 14:07:38 -0600
Message-ID: <3CD6E844.6010303@icantbelieveimdoingthis.com>
Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 14:32:04 -0600
From: "Arthur H. Edwards,1,505-853-6042,505-256-0834"
 <edwards@icantbelieveimdoingthis.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020326
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Jinks <mjinks@uchicago.edu>
CC:  debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: gnomecal segfaulting for anyone else?
References: <[🔎] 20020501172858.GA2290@sysvi.com> <[🔎] 20020503231553.A13607@icantbelieveimdoingthis.com> <[🔎] 20020506141510.GA29947@sysvi.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=4.7 tests=SUBJ_ENDS_IN_Q_MARK version=2.01

Michael Jinks wrote:

>FWIW, after Friday's round of dist-upgrade my gnomecal problems went
>away, apparently a bug made it into the archive and was fixed a few days
>later, or so I'd guess.
>
>-mrj
>
>On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 11:15:53PM -0600, Art Edwards wrote:
>
>>Yes, it happened to me as well. 
>>Is there any simple, relatively painless, way to reinstall testing from
>>the beginning after going through many many dist-upgrades? I have heard
>>that people are having little or no difficulty upgrading from stable
>>now. Is this true?
>>
>>Incidentally, this morning xemacs started acting inappropriately.
>>paren-highlighting is acting hyperactive. anyone else experiencing that?
>>
>>Art Edwards
>>
>>On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 12:28:58PM -0500, Michael Jinks wrote:
>>
>>>Hi all; as of this morning, gnomecal has started segfaulting on my
>>>workstation (woody/intel).  I don't think it's due to any corruption in
>>>my data files, since it happens regardless of which user runs the
>>>program including a new dummy user with no previous calendar history.
>>>
>>>I did apply the latest upgrades yesterday afternoon, so I'm wondering if
>>>something might have introduced a bug.  I did another apt-get upgrade
>>>this morning after discovering the calendar problem but it hasn't
>>>helped.
>>>
>>>I guess all I'm really asking is, has anybody else had this problem or
>>>is it just me?
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>-mrj
>>>-- 
>>># Michael Jinks, IB # JFI/MRSEC/EFI Computing # University of Chicago #
>>>      Reader!  Think not that
>>>      technical information
>>>      ought not be called speech;  -- Anonymous, "How to decrypt a DVD"
>>>
>>>
>>>-- 
>>>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
>>>with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>>>
>>>
>>-- 
>>Arthur H. Edwards
>>712 Valencia Dr. NE
>>Abq. NM 87108
>>
>>(505) 256-0834
>>
>
I also have a working gnomecal. Interestinly, the dist-upgrade commands 
did nothing because there were no new packages.

Mystified but content

Art Edwards

-- 
Arthur H. Edwards
712 Valencia Dr. NE
Albuquerque NM 87108




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org