Re: using Woody vs testing
Ken Irving, 2002-Feb-27 09:18 -0900:
>
> I'm wondering about the difference between using "woody" vs "testing"
> in apt-sources. I currently have "testing" in my systems, but perhaps
> "woody" might be preferable. Assuming woody (as current testing) does
> what I need, it ought to continue being sufficient once it becomes
> stable. What happens to testing when woody becomes stable? Does sid
> (suddenly?) become testing? I'm sure the answers to these questions
> are in the documentation, so any pointers (RTFM) will be appreciated.
>
> Ken
Start here:
http://www.debian.org/releases/
--
Jeff Coppock Systems Engineer
Diggin' Debian Admin and User
Reply to: