using Woody vs testing

To: Debian-User Mailing List <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: using Woody vs testing
From: Ken Irving <jkirving@mosquitonet.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 09:18:23 -0900
Message-id: <[🔎] 20020227181822.GA11959@moffit.tridentsw>

I'm wondering about the difference between using "woody" vs "testing"
in apt-sources.  I currently have "testing" in my systems, but perhaps
"woody" might be preferable.  Assuming woody (as current testing) does
what I need, it ought to continue being sufficient once it becomes 
stable.  What happens to testing when woody becomes stable? Does sid
(suddenly?) become testing?   I'm sure the answers to these questions
are in the documentation, so any pointers (RTFM) will be appreciated.

Ken

-- 
Ken Irving <jkirving@mosquitonet.com>

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: using Woody vs testing
  - From: Jeff <jcoppock1@attbi.com>
- Re: using Woody vs testing
  - From: Eric Richardson <eric.richardson@milagrosoft.com>
- Re: using Woody vs testing
  - From: Dave Sherohman <esper@sherohman.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Sound after restarting from win$$
Next by Date: Re: Which mail suite
Previous by thread: Debconf X config doesnt offer mouse protocol choices
Next by thread: Re: using Woody vs testing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread