[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: sources.list question



[snip]

> I remember pine is only available as source due to licensing issue and
> removed from binary distribution.  If I were desparate, I might download
> source package and compile.  (Which I believe comes with pico.)
> 
> But, I will recommend you to move to "mutt" if you used "pine" or 
> "elm".  As for "pico", install "nano".
> 
so what is non-free for if it doesn't cover things like pine?  

Nano is fine btw - I'm just asking out of curiosity now.
> 



Reply to: