Re: SpamBouncer
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 10:26:51AM -0800, Wendell Cochran wrote:
> Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 07:02:04 -0500
> From: stan <stanb@awod.com>
>
> > > > >On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 10:52:03AM -0500, stan wrote:
>
> >> . . . Mostly SpamBouncer is a spam blocker. . . . but it's hard
> >> to get it to block all spam without also blocking a lot of legit stuff.
>
> >I've been usnig it for 5+ years, and I really don't have that problem.
> >Do you have proper procmail recipies for all you mailing lists?
>
> >The only other thing I can think of that might be different for you than me,
> >is that I'm pretty agressive in comunicating to people that I desire to receive
> >mail from how to send "proper" email (eg not hTML etc.)
>
>
> I too have been getting tough about such things. No cc:, dammit, but
> bcc: Etc.
>
> If you have boilerplate -- stock instructions for a general case -- can
> you share?
>
Sorry, I don't
At present, if it's anyone I really want to gear from (a failry small list). I
give them a call and tell them to send text only email, if they want it to not
go to /dev/null.
--
"They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve
neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin
Reply to: