Re: SpamBouncer
>>"Blars" == Blars Blarson <blarson@blars.org> writes:
Blars> In article <[🔎] 20020207215629.GC30571@dman.ddts.net> dsh8290@rit.edu writes:
>> On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 10:52:03AM -0500, stan wrote:
>>> Anyone know if SpamBouncer www.spambouncer.org is being mainatined?
>> dunno
It is, intermittently. I use it
Blars> Me neither. Since what it does is bombard the victim the
Blars> spammer forged in the headers, hopfully it's dead and won't be
Blars> revived. If you want to bounce spam, do it in the SMTP
Blars> session you're receiving the message in.
It does not do so unless you configure it to. I don't send
bounces, either to harass the victims or to confirm my email address.
>>> If not, any sugestions as to an alternate?
>> http://dman.ddts.net/~dman/config_docs/exim_spamassassin.html
Blars> Does something totally different, and could be useful. The
Blars> default rule scoring seems pretty far off to me though.
I use both in sequence, along with mailagent, and I rarely see spam.
manoj
--
Even if a fool lived with a wise man all his life, he would still not
recognise the truth, like a wooden spoon cannot recognise the flavour
of the soup. 64
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: