Re: SpamBouncer
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 05:57:02PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
| In article <[🔎] 20020207215629.GC30571@dman.ddts.net> dsh8290@rit.edu writes:
| >On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 10:52:03AM -0500, stan wrote:
| >| Anyone know if SpamBouncer www.spambouncer.org is being mainatined?
| >dunno
|
| Me neither. Since what it does is bombard the victim the spammer forged
| in the headers, hopfully it's dead and won't be revived. If you want to
| bounce spam, do it in the SMTP session you're receiving the message in.
Oh, I didn't even know what it was. This is a _really_ bad idea since
the From: address can very easily be forged.
| >| If not, any sugestions as to an alternate?
| >http://dman.ddts.net/~dman/config_docs/exim_spamassassin.html
|
| Does something totally different,
Apparently. It is still related to spam though ;-).
| and could be useful.
| The default rule scoring seems pretty far off to me though.
Can you expand on this?
-D
--
It took the computational power of three Commodore 64s to fly to the moon.
It takes at least a 486 to run Windows 95.
Something is wrong here.
Reply to: