[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: /etc/resolve.conf



Hi,

I would like to thank you for your advise.  You don't know how relieved I
am.  Finally had a spare moment from the wife and I did as you told me and
it is downloading as I type.  My windows machine was already set up for ICS.

Cheers Al


----- Original Message -----
From: Cameron Matheson <cmatheson3@yahoo.com>
To: Alan & Kerry Shrimpton <loverslane.poodles@ihug.co.nz>;
<debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2002 10:38 AM
Subject: Re: /etc/resolve.conf


> Hi,
>
> On Saturday 19 January 2002 02:17 pm, Alan & Kerry Shrimpton wrote:
> > My windows machine is connected to the Internet via dialup.  My Linux
> > machine is on the network.  It can dual boot windows or Linux.  Using
> > dselect I have set up the access but when I do the update I get errors
like
> > Could not resolve, Failed to fetch etc etc.
> >
> > Can someone help?  What do you need to know?  I have read a lot of
Howto's.
> > One think I think is strange is I don't have /etc/resolve.conf
> > Is this normal?
>
> Hey, if you don't have a resolv.conf you'll need to make one.  Just make
it
> look something like this:
>
> <resolv.conf>
> nameserver <DNS Nameserver #1>
> nameserver <DNS Nameserver #2>
> </resolv.conf>
>
> Where the nameserver's (you only need 1, you can add other ones optionally
> (if you have them).  For the nameserver you should put your windoze box if
> it's set up to do that, or if it's not then set it as your isp's Primary
and
> Secondary DNS.  You'll also need to set your gateway to your windows
computer
> by editing /etc/network/interfaces.  Windows will need to be running
> something like ICS too...
>
> Cameron Matheson
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>



Reply to: