Re: Large file sizes (2+Gb)
In article <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.21.0201161407180.1108-100000@miami.datech2.er.heitec.net>,
Holger Rauch <Holger.Rauch@heitec.de> wrote:
>Hi Miquel!
>
>On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
>
>> Also ext2 and ext3 support 64-bit filesizes just fine and have done
>> so for years. They are very stable filesystems, while reiser is
>> experimental. Reiser can be unstable (I've seen filesystems go
>> up in smoke) and it *especially* has problems with being exported
>> over the network. My advice: do not use reiserfs.
>
>What makes you think ext3 is not experimental? reiserfs exists for a
>longer time compared to ext3. If you say that reiserfs *can* be unstable
>it also means that there are some stable releases out there. I haven't had
>any problems with reiserfs.
I'm just stating what my experience is. Make of it what you wish.
Mike.
Reply to: