Re: setting up spamassassin (alternative)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 18 January 2002 1:04 am, dman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 09:27:36PM +0000, Alan Chandler wrote:
...
>
> | # This transport does a spam check to look for spam and then re-injects
> | # the message into exim
> |
> | command = spamc | exim -oMr spam_checked -f $sender_address
> | \$LOCAL_PART use_shell = true
>
> Can anyone else comment on the fragility or robustness of this? I
> think Paul's expansion to use "mailer-daemon" instead of the empty
I found that if $sender_address is null (ie a bounce message) then
$LOCAL_PART becomes $sender_address and exim fails for lack of recipients.
The mail goes down a black hole (which is what your want in this situation).
- --
Alan - alan@chandlerfamily.org.uk
http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8R8sP1mf3M5ZDr2kRAqt7AJ9SLDN1e9WoVgOZK4DZ1b7yAJSa7wCgwngg
6nFKV4JpAniLXhPq9Fx9Ptk=
=Bs/V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: