Re: Debian Vs RedHat
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 11 January 2002 11:02 am, Paolo Alexis Falcone wrote:
> I forgot where in my mailbox was the original post, but anyway I'll reply.
>
> I like the Debian GNU/Linux distribution better than RedHat's for all the
> good things it all has.
>
> Won't say screw RedHat the Co., however. Thankful for them for doing much
> of the pioneering work for the community (and maybe some grata for forcibly
> dragging us in the future like libc6). Sure they do make rough cuts most of
> the time, but just like Alan Cox said, I'd believe that if RedHat won't do
> it, probably, nobody would... (unless proven otherwise)
>
> But anyway, I like Debian better. And I use it. And I don't like RHL on my
> machines for the hard time they gave me maintaining them a year ago. Debian
> already works so fine - it ain't broke so don't fix it, but improve it.
I like Mandrake for being smooth, and up-to-date.
I *hate* Mandrake for being RPM-based: after a certain point,
you fall so far behind, even when applying updates, that you
have to upgrade to the latest version of the product. And let
me tell you: upgrading Mandrake is a Perilous Journey.
"apt-get upgrade" is the *absolute* best...
- --
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ron Johnson, Jr. Home: ron.l.johnson@cox.net |
| Jefferson, LA USA http://ronandheather.dhs.org |
| |
! "Millions of Chinese speak Chinese, and it's not |
! hereditary..." |
! Dr. Dean Adell(sp?) !
+------------------------------------------------------------+
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8Pyv6jTz5dS9Us5wRAlvjAJ4sAqZhdOgnLN5e97hw5nP1OIyRMgCfSayI
AlJRhzPM1bSQKhLh5qwMFU8=
=6P6j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: