[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: OT: performance problems.



On Wednesday 09 January 2002 00:00, Brian Nelson wrote:
> csj <csj@mindgate.net> writes:
> > On Mon, 7 Jan 2002 15:59:20 +0100
> >
> > martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net> wrote:
> > > also sprach Christoph Simon <ciccio@kiosknet.com.br> [2002.01.07.1547 
+0100]:
> > > > > is this good or bad? hda2 is my swap partition:
> > > >
> > > > This is bad (<1/6).
> > >
> > > what do you mean?
> > >
> > > > > /dev/hda2:
> > > > >  Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in  0.99 seconds = 129.29
> > > > > MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads:  64  MB in 21.93 seconds =  
> > > > > 2.92 MB/sec
> > > >
> > > > /dev/hda1:
> > > >  Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in  0.77 seconds =166.23 MB/sec
> > > >  Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  3.33 seconds = 19.22 MB/sec
> > >
> > > jealous! what's the RPM on your drive?
> >
> > Are you sure it's something to get jealous over? I'm pretty sure I have
> > a 5400rpm 20GB drive (by Fujitsu). Look at my stats after I enabled DMA
> > and (some other kernel options I don't have at the tip of my finger right
> > now):
> >
> > # hdparm -Tt /dev/hda
> >
> > /dev/hda:
> >  Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in  0.82 seconds =156.10 MB/sec
> >  Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  2.99 seconds = 21.40 MB/sec
> >
> > I've seen a discussion here some whiles back about a guy who got
> > 33MB+/sec.
>
> It's all about scsi baby...
>
> /dev/sdb:
>  Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in  0.78 seconds =164.10 MB/sec
>  Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  1.62 seconds = 39.51 MB/sec

Well, IDE is not that bad...

/dev/hda:
 Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in  0.68 seconds =188.24 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  3.20 seconds = 20.00 MB/sec

/dev/hdb:
 Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in  0.67 seconds =191.04 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  4.01 seconds = 15.96 MB/sec

-- 
Meir Kriheli



Reply to: