Re: NIST time

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: NIST time
From: John Hasler <john@dhh.gt.org>
Date: 04 Jan 2002 13:02:13 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 873d1m0wju.fsf@toncho.dhh.gt.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 3C35E344.3D36D8B5@quiknet.com>
References: <[🔎] 3C34A739.DEA2FF12@quiknet.com> <[🔎] 20020104072555.B10515@sammo.gnubies.com> <[🔎] 87d70r3z2e.fsf@toncho.dhh.gt.org> <3C34D885.9C0575E7@quiknet.com> <[🔎] 874rm33spy.fsf@toncho.dhh.gt.org> <3C350B75.DD483101@quiknet.com> <873d1m3e1v.fsf@toncho.dhh.gt.org> <[🔎] 3C35E344.3D36D8B5@quiknet.com>

Paul E Condon wrote:
> Therefore, debian hackers should not waste their time trying to solve
> problems that they imagine such a person might have.

I wrote:
> What are you talking about?

Paul E Condon writes:
> The current standard precision clock...

I know all that.  I'm asking you to identify the imaginary problems that
you claim Debian hackers are wasting time trying to solve. 

Please do not cc: me.  I read the list.
-- 
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: NIST time
  - From: Paul E Condon <pecondon@quiknet.com>

References:
- NIST time
  - From: Paul E Condon <pecondon@quiknet.com>
- Re: NIST time
  - From: Sam Varghese <sam@gnubies.com>
- Re: NIST time
  - From: John Hasler <john@dhh.gt.org>
- Re: NIST time
  - From: John Hasler <john@dhh.gt.org>
- Re: NIST time
  - From: Paul E Condon <pecondon@quiknet.com>

Prev by Date: cant open display
Next by Date: removal of XFree3
Previous by thread: Re: NIST time
Next by thread: Re: NIST time
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread