Re: "upgrade" vs "dist-upgrade"

To: debian mailing list <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: "upgrade" vs "dist-upgrade"
From: Hans Ekbrand <hans@sociologi.cjb.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 12:12:55 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20011101121255.A11981@emac140.socio.gu.se>
Mail-followup-to: hans, debian mailing list <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87lmhqzv7w.fsf@objectmentor.com>; from koss@objectmentor.com on Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 04:38:59AM -0500
References: <3BE07169.B61C8058@home.com> <20011031235701.B2652@bart> <[🔎] 87lmhqzv7w.fsf@objectmentor.com>

On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 04:38:59AM -0500, Bob Koss wrote:
> If I'm already tracking woody, should I be routinely using "upgrade"
> or "dist-upgrade" ?
> 

upgrade

Attachment: pgplRiQW5XR3V.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- Re: "upgrade" vs "dist-upgrade"
  - From: Bob Koss <koss@objectmentor.com>

Prev by Date: pppd and kernel 2.4.7
Next by Date: Re: ISA AWE64 not detected
Previous by thread: Re: "upgrade" vs "dist-upgrade"
Next by thread: Re: "upgrade" vs "dist-upgrade"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread