On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 02:50:58AM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote: > > A zillion people will now bitch at you and claim that qmail is > "non-free". While that's the debian party line I'm beginning to > suspect debian holds this view because of the abrasive personal nature > of Mr. Bernstein rather than a careful analysis of what's posted at > his site. (Note to zealots: I'm not interested in your flames. Yell > at your dog). no Bernstein's attitude has nothing whatsoever to do with the fact that qmail is non-free, it fails DSFG 1, 3, and 4. you can find the DSFG at: http://www.debian.org/social_contract#guidelines this is not a flame, this is facts to correct your FUD. however, if you don't want flames don't post unadulterated flamebait. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
Attachment:
pgpJNcvXT2HFX.pgp
Description: PGP signature