Re: Dangers in "upgrading" to unstable?

To: Colin Cashman <ccashman@mediaone.net>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Dangers in "upgrading" to unstable?
From: Andrei Ivanov <scorpio@arshes.dyndns.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 09:38:05 -0600 (CST)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.21.0102010935520.31867-100000@Scorpio>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 001301c08c63$8a99f390$6b10a8c0@ccashman>

I've upgraded to unstable over a period of time.....libc first, then
X yesterday. Its been pretty stable so far, but you never know, you may
run into some upgrade problems with your hardware (took me a while to get
the X upgraded properly so it was usable).
Overall you should be alright, I think.
Andrei

------------------------------------------------------------------
First there was Explorer...
Then came Expedition.
This summer....
	Coming to a street near you..
		Ford Exterminator.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrei Ivanov
http://arshes.dyndns.org
scorpio@arshes.dyndns.org
12402354
------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply to:

References:
- Dangers in "upgrading" to unstable?
  - From: "Colin Cashman" <ccashman@mediaone.net>

Prev by Date: Dangers in "upgrading" to unstable?
Next by Date: Re: grill
Previous by thread: Dangers in "upgrading" to unstable?
Next by thread: Re: Dangers in "upgrading" to unstable?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread