Re: X development packages broken in woody?

[<debuser@platinum.globalmart.com>]

> You wouldn't have these problems if you would ignore the damn code names
> and track the appropriate distribution.  If you want to track unstable
> point to unstable, not woody.
> 
> _Don't_ _use_ _code_ _names_.

But I did not want to track unstable, I wanted to track woody. That is, I
didn't want "apt-get update; apt-get upgrade" to start tracking sid the
moment sid became available. I wanted to stick with woody when it became
frozen/stable. This is what I did near the end of potato's development.
But, I guess I can't do that anymore.