Re: samba 2.0.7 vs. 2.0.5
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> Shouldn´t samba 2.0.7 depend on a kernel >= 2.2 then? This seems like a
> bug to me (I ran into the same problem but have put samba on hold since
> then).
IMO that would break when you don't havea 2.2 kernel package installed and
do everything the old fasioned way :)
But you really should ask the samba package maintainer that question.
- --
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Phil Brutsche pbrutsch@tux.creighton.edu
GPG fingerprint: 9BF9 D84C 37D0 4FA7 1F2D 7E5E FD94 D264 50DE 1CFC
GPG key id: 50DE1CFC
GPG public key: http://tux.creighton.edu/~pbrutsch/gpg-public-key.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE6LSRS/ZTSZFDeHPwRAkI7AKDbVijlopsl7O+IM9UlUT1Yh4PG3gCg4YUa
LD9wR8uoCxo7ovaI4t6e8Wo=
=DS2M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: