[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: samba 2.0.7 vs. 2.0.5



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...

> I thought I saw some sort of posting here or elsewhere that mentioned
> that 2.0.7 works with kernels 2.2.x but not 2.0.x (mine) ?

If you're trying to use the distributed samba 2.0.7 on a 2.0.x kernel it
won't work - you'll need to recompile samba or upgrade the kernel to
2.2.x.

> Does this sound about right, or is there something wrong with my
> smb.conf?  Also, is there any particular compelling reason to upgrade
> to 2.0.7 as 2.0.5 seems to work pretty well for us?

If 2.0.5 works I would say stick with it.  You only really need 2.0.7 if
you have any Win2k machines that need to connect to the samba server.

- -- 
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Phil Brutsche				    pbrutsch@tux.creighton.edu

GPG fingerprint: 9BF9 D84C 37D0 4FA7 1F2D  7E5E FD94 D264 50DE 1CFC
GPG key id: 50DE1CFC
GPG public key: http://tux.creighton.edu/~pbrutsch/gpg-public-key.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6LCDi/ZTSZFDeHPwRAun2AJ43cTqMYuavshxuNrJpktYKQ9axLwCgt7vK
lHIuaSwyXZGuWZPc2GF5sgI=
=bJ64
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: