Re: Packages I Don't want to upgrade
Troy Telford said:
> Also - I know there is a XF4 deb packaging project, and it's rather...
> alpha. Is there at least a meta-package that will meet all the XF86
> dependancies, and not be overwritten by XF86 3 debs? (Meaning, it meets
> the deps for it, but it'll let me use the existing tarball installation
> from XF86.org?)
Check out the equivs package. It lets you create dummy packages that say
various dependencies are provided/required to handle situations like this.
--
"Two words: Windows survives." - Craig Mundie, Microsoft senior strategist
"So does syphillis. Good thing we have penicillin." - Matthew Alton
Geek Code 3.1: GCS d- s+: a- C++ UL++$ P+>+++ L+++>++++ E- W--(++) N+ o+
!K w---$ O M- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t 5++ X+ R++ tv b+ DI++++ D G e* h+ r++ y+
Reply to: