[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Re: dpkg: error processing netkit-inetd (--configure)



hi there ....

I removed the "-e" and replaced it 
with the "-x"... i don"t know, but it works
well. can someone explain me what the 
"-e" argument in the shebang line means/triggers?

jens

On Thu, 10 Aug 2000, Ben Collins wrote:
> Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 19:19:51 +0200
> To: Mark Schiltz <mark@doyou.com>
> From: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
> Subject: Re: dpkg: error processing netkit-inetd (--configure)
> 
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 11:53:11AM -0500, Mark Schiltz wrote:
> > I just permormed a dselect-update, apt-get dist-upgrade on a
> woody machine
> > (kernel 2.2.17pre6) and have a slight netbase 4.0 problem. The
> new netbase won't
> > install do to the unconfigured netkit-inetd. Not a critical
> machine. If
> > anyone has any advise it would be appreciated. :) Here is the
> error info:
> > 
> > dpkg: error processing netkit-inetd (--configure):
> >  subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status
> 10
> > dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of netbase:
> >  netbase depends on netkit-inetd; however:
> >   Package netkit-inetd is not configured yet.
> > dpkg: error processing netbase (--configure):
> >  dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
> > Errors were encountered while processing:
> >  netkit-inetd
> >  netbase
> 
> Edit /var/lib/dpkg/info/netkit-inetd.postinst add -x to the first
> line so
> it looks like this:
> 
> 	#!/bin/sh -x
> 
> The run "dpkg --configure netkit-inetd" and see where in that
> script it
> dies.
> 
> Ben
> 
> -- 
> 
>
-----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------
> /  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian
> GNU/Linux   \
> `  bcollins@debian.org  --  bcollins@openldap.org  -- 
> bcollins@linux.com  '
> 
>
`---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'
> 
> 
> -- 
> Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe
> debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
> 
> 



Reply to: