[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

XFree86 4.0.1 from source



Howdy folks,

I successfully compiled XFree 4.0.1 from source with some very helpful
suggestions from a /. post.  I've compiled alot of source, but never
anything this big.  anyway, it went fine, everything in /usr/local/X11R6/
and all the configs are fine and I even get the xserver to start and
initialize everything just fine except one thing.  Even though I installed
the fonts, and they exist in their respective dirs. (under
/usr/local/X11R6/)  I still get the following errors:

Could not init font path element /usr/local/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/,
removing from list!
Could not init font path element /usr/local/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/,
removing from list!

I peeked in the specified dirs, and here are the contents:

~/Speedo/
ls -l
total 538
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        73994 Jan 14  2000 font0419.spd
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        73570 Jan 14  2000 font0582.spd
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        74266 Jan 14  2000 font0583.spd
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        73686 Jan 14  2000 font0611.spd
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        59472 Jan 14  2000 font0648.spd
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        61214 Jan 14  2000 font0649.spd
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        59460 Jan 14  2000 font0709.spd
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        61065 Jan 14  2000 font0710.spd
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root          564 Jan 21  2000 fonts.dir
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root          564 Jan 21  2000 fonts.scale

and the other:

~/Type1/
ls -l
total 1471
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        21991 Jan 14  2000 UTBI____.afm
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        75363 Jan 14  2000 UTBI____.pfa
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        21529 Jan 14  2000 UTB_____.afm
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        72834 Jan 14  2000 UTB_____.pfa
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        21960 Jan 14  2000 UTI_____.afm
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        74892 Jan 14  2000 UTI_____.pfa
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        22144 Jan 14  2000 UTRG____.afm
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        72354 Jan 14  2000 UTRG____.pfa
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        15395 Jan 14  2000 c0419bt_.afm
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        40766 Jan 14  2000 c0419bt_.pfb
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        15407 Jan 14  2000 c0582bt_.afm
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        39511 Jan 14  2000 c0582bt_.pfb
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        15397 Jan 14  2000 c0583bt_.afm
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        40008 Jan 14  2000 c0583bt_.pfb
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        15414 Jan 14  2000 c0611bt_.afm
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        39871 Jan 14  2000 c0611bt_.pfb
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        21626 Jan 14  2000 c0632bt_.afm
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        33799 Jan 14  2000 c0632bt_.pfb
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        22099 Jan 14  2000 c0633bt_.afm
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        35229 Jan 14  2000 c0633bt_.pfb
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        19764 Jan 14  2000 c0648bt_.afm
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        34869 Jan 14  2000 c0648bt_.pfb
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        19927 Jan 14  2000 c0649bt_.afm
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        35118 Jan 14  2000 c0649bt_.pfb
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        29887 Jan 14  2000 cour.afm
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root       126064 Jan 14  2000 cour.pfa
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        29815 Jan 14  2000 courb.afm
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root       126868 Jan 14  2000 courb.pfa
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        29979 Jan 14  2000 courbi.afm
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root       125201 Jan 14  2000 courbi.pfa
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root        30032 Jan 14  2000 couri.afm
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root       122124 Jan 14  2000 couri.pfa
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root         1075 Jan 21  2000 fonts.dir
-rw-r--r--   1 root     root         1075 Jan 21  2000 fonts.scale


Does this look right?

I apologize in advance if I've just done something lame and can't see it.
But, if anyone has any ideas, I would GREATLY appreciate hearing them.  I
feel it so close now, and it'd be great to see my rage128 actually
outperform my old S3Virge.... sheesh.

thanks,
Dave

"Linux...  It's the choice of a GNU generation"




Reply to: