[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: web server suggestions



A good cross-platform webserver is Orion (www.orionserver.com). It's 100%
pure java, so it runs on any Java2 platform. Forget Perl, forget ASP, do
Servlets and JSP.
Performance is excellent.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: frosty [mailto:frosty]On Behalf Of John Foster
> Sent: Friday, July 28, 2000 6:04 AM
> To: Sven Burgener
> Cc: Debian ISP; Debian Users
> Subject: Re: web server suggestions
>
>
> Sven Burgener wrote:
> >
> > Hi all
> >
> > Sorry for this being so highly off-topic, forgive me; I
> need the infos.
> > (It's just that debian lists are an excellent resort for
> information)
> >
> > I'd like some infos from people who've had experience with this:
> >
> > What web server software is in your opinion best for
> running on an NT
> > machine? (Yes, NT)
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> For reasons of compatibility and ease of maintainence, I strongly
> suggest staying with IIs or some other server designed for NT. It (NT)
> has enough problems without trying to get it to do something that
> Microsoft has effectively tried to keep folks from doing (using open
> source software).
>
>
> > (How) does Apache run on NT?
>
> It runs fine, but the windows version is not as robust as the
> Linux/Unix
> etc. version. Plus, you will need to install some type of Perl
> (ActiveState) to get it to do anything worthwhile.
>
> > The reason I'm posting this, though, is, that a friend of
> mine needs the
> > infos, so I'll send any replies straight back to him.
>
> Tell your friend to check out the Apache and the ActiveState web site
> for explicit info.
>
> --
> AdVance-Computing Systems
>
> We sell fine quality servers and workstations.
> We specialize in multiprocessor units.
> We install Debian Linux at no extra charge!
>
> John Foster
> jfoster@augustmail.com
> ICQ# 19460173
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe
> debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
>



Reply to: