Re: standard large memory question
On Wed, 12 Jul 2000, Richard E. Hawkins wrote:
>
> Ack. I've seen the answer to this dozens of times, but can't find it
> in the archives.
>
> I *thought* that large memory was now automatically detected, but my
> system on a nice fresh frozen is still only finding 64M (out of 160M)
>
> So I've used
>
> mem=160
>
> at lilo, but the kernel panics trying to create caches. Even mem=65
> does this.
>
> Am I missing something obvious?
Yes. The units i.e. mem=160M
>
> rick
>
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
>
Reply to: