Re: XF4.0 deb eta?
Ok,
This is a very good reason. I did get the binary installed and
running happily. I still like the idea of .deb so I'll clean and
re-install when they come out, but this probably the best reason
to wait.
Robert
Thus spake Sean 'Shaleh' Perry (shaleh@valinux.com):
>
> On 27-May-2000 Robert L. Harris wrote:
> >
> >
> > Ok,
> > Not trying to tick anyone off, but I need the NVIDIA driver for my new
> > video card and it appears to require XF-4.0. I'd rather keep to .debs and
> > not go source or converted .rpm, so I can keep my box "clean"...
> > Anyone got an eta or a really cookbooks install/config for putting 4.0
> > on a "woody" system.
> >
> > Robert
> >
>
> roughly a month. The debian maintainer is waiting on 4.0.1. Several large
> bugs, attacks, etc are closed in this release. Also support for non x86
> hardware is added, which is important for Debian, we have a strong base of
> SPARC users.
:wq!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert L. Harris | Micros~1 :
Senior System Engineer | For when quality, reliability
at RnD Consulting | and security just aren't
\_ that important!
DISCLAIMER:
These are MY OPINIONS ALONE. I speak for no-one else.
FYI:
perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);'
Reply to: