[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: the gimp?



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Thu, 18 Nov 1999, Rob Mahurin wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 17, 1999 at 12:44:00PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> > 
> > Debian guarentees that everything in it's main distribution is free, which
> > makes preprending -free to package names quite pointless. The gimp package
> > suggests gimp-nonfree, which means that if you use dselect or any other
> > reasonable tool for selecting gimp, and you have set up your system to
> > access the nbon-free archives, you will be shown gimp-nonfree when you
> > select gimp for installation.
> 
> Really?
> 
> peon:~# apt-get install gimp
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
>   gimp 
> [...]
>
> gimp-nonfree is definitely available (it's reinstalling right now).
> But I already knew about it.  I remember finding out about it being a
> PITA, though.  For those of us who don't spend our free time reading
> package dependencies, the name "gimp" doesn't suggest there's a
> "gimp-nonfree" any more than "shellutils" suggests a
> "shellutils-nonfree".

Dselect will prompt you for every sugested and recommended package, which
is not installed (apt-get don't, one could file a wishlist-bug against
apt, who about an comand line option to show not installed, suggested
packages, something like 'apt-get show-suggested gimp' in this case). But
when using dselect you don't have to look at the dependencies.

> [...]

Martin

- -- 
If Windows is the answer, can we please have the problem back?

For public PGP-key: finger mfluch@mathphys.fsk.uni-heidelberg.de

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBODQUfLCGSMW7I2etAQEUXgP/XfN0C10zVKUxEWMWVG2NF4cYME1KeKsH
BGY7M5AhWV0lxsT+zbVKe+4OU8vdoUG37qvnKwWVT0q7oyzFxj7hZzhom6AfuSsk
hIoUPCwlpGC9dEXsVafYclBjcg2g6CG8t+Dq0botQsrClDvFxSUHXHo35i5G8NI1
usHxzc4zCIQ=
=ZJxk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: