Re: the gimp?

[Rob Mahurin <robm@mad.scientist.com>]

On Mon, Nov 15, 1999 at 01:36:26PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 1999 at 01:11:34PM -0500, Ian Stirling wrote:
> > "E.L. Meijer (Eric)" wrote:
> > 
> > > I think it is a bad idea to call it `debian gimp'.  If you do that you
> > > suggest that debian has a heavily modified, enhanced version of gimp.
> > > If I were one of the gimp developers I wouldn't like it if someone (say
> > > Corel) would take it, remove some plugins, and then tack their name on
> > > it (`Corel gimp'??).
> > > 
> > > Eric
> > 
> > They are entitled to if it's gpl software but it would
> > be rude and inconsiderate. What about 'debian-gimp-lite'?
> 
> Why does Debian have to be in there? Why not just `gimp-lite'?
> 

Why not just preach?  'gimp-libre'?

Rob

-- 
Insufficient facts always invite danger.
		-- Spock, "Space Seed", stardate 3141.9