Re: Problem with named
On 15 Nov 1999, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
itz >Hmm, doesn't that defeat the purpose of running named in the first
itz >place? I'd add a new zone file and reference it from /etc/named.conf.
i run named mainly on my dialup for ipmasq. for some reason DNS does not
get masq'd for me under kernel 2.2 ..it masqs fine under 2.0 but i could
never get it workin under 2.2. i suppose adding a new zone for a local
network would be useful but unless its a big one i cant imagine a real
advantage over just using hosts ..
nate
----------------------------------------[mailto:aphro@aphroland.org ]--
Vice President Network Operations http://www.firetrail.com/
Firetrail Internet Services Limited http://www.aphroland.org/
Everett, WA 425-348-7336 http://www.linuxpowered.net/
Powered By: http://comedy.aphroland.org/
Debian 2.1 Linux 2.0.36 SMP http://yahoo.aphroland.org/
-----------------------------------------[mailto:aphro@netquest.net ]--
2:20pm up 88 days, 1:53, 1 user, load average: 1.69, 1.58, 1.56
Reply to: