Re: Kernel-image 2.2.10 or linux.tar.gz 2.2.10?
On Fri, 12 Nov 1999, David J. Kanter wrote:
djkant >And is the potential error with the system.map easily fixable if I were to
djkant >use the tar.gz file? (Just look for where the symlink points to the new
djkant >system.map, right?)
i've enver had a problem upgrading from 2.0 to 2.1/2.2 in terms of that
system.map file i dont get why others do..ive upgraded many many systems
and never had any trouble be it debian slink 2.1 or slackware 3.2 ..i
always compile my kernles from sources.
as for the image, the image is just that ..a generic image..id go for the
source grab it from a kernel.org mirror and do it that way.
nate
----------------------------------------[mailto:aphro@aphroland.org ]--
Vice President Network Operations http://www.firetrail.com/
Firetrail Internet Services Limited http://www.aphroland.org/
Everett, WA 425-348-7336 http://www.linuxpowered.net/
Powered By: http://comedy.aphroland.org/
Debian 2.1 Linux 2.0.36 SMP http://yahoo.aphroland.org/
-----------------------------------------[mailto:aphro@netquest.net ]--
11:41pm up 85 days, 11:13, 2 users, load average: 1.74, 1.77, 1.75
Reply to: