Re: apt-get

To: William Burrow <aa126@fan.nb.ca>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: apt-get
From: Randy Edwards <redwards@golgotha.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 1999 03:07:16 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 382CD5E4.70CB2C19@golgotha.net>
Reply-to: redwards@golgotha.net
References: <[🔎] 19991111134545.F456@fan.nb.ca> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.10.9911112305470.7450-100000@fun93.kivikko.hoas.fi> <[🔎] 19991111223210.D11022@fan.nb.ca>

> OK, so I guess I have to bite the bullet.  How is the general opinion on
> potato at the moment?

   IMHO, the biggest problem I've seen is that NIS is broken (has some files
that conflicts with hostname).  Bind will need some major reconfiguration,
along with some other things probably; but generally, Potato isn't in that
bad a shape.

-- 
 Regards,    | <redwards@golgotha.net>   | Linux: superior operating
 .           | <http://www.golgotha.net> |  system tools for those
 Randy       |                           | who know how to use them.

Reply to:

References:
- apt-get
  - From: William Burrow <aa126@fan.nb.ca>
- Re: apt-get
  - From: Martin Fluch <fluch@rock.helsinki.fi>
- Re: apt-get
  - From: William Burrow <aa126@fan.nb.ca>

Prev by Date: Does anybody use pcsnd driver?
Next by Date: Re: symbolic link?
Previous by thread: Re: apt-get
Next by thread: Re: apt-get
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread