Re: glibc2.1
On Tue, Nov 09, 1999 at 05:34:46AM -0800, Kenneth Scharf wrote:
> Now that potato is delayed until next year I think I
> should try upgrading to glibc2.1 at least. There are
> just too many fine programs out on freshmeat that
> require 2.1 over 2.0. I know that it's been posted
> before, but I've lost the url... can someone repeat
> the procedure to upgrade slink to glibc2.1? I can
> live with the 2.0.38 kernel for now, about the only
> thing I think I'll miss would be USB and at the moment
> I only have a mouse....
IMHO, the safest way to upgrade to glibc 2.1 IS to upgrade to potato.
The delay was mainly because of the remaining work needed for
boot-floppies, which won't affect those upgrading.
1. Point /etc/apt/sources.list to "unstable" instead of "stable".
2. apt-get update
3. apt-get dist-upgrade
Run step 3 repeatedly if you get errors. This may at times be
necessary, as the stability of potato varies from day to day. Now is
probably a good time as console-data was fixed in yesterday's update
and the dependencies for console-apt are now satisfied.
I've been running potato on one of my systems for over six months and
it's had a few problems but has never been completely hosed. On the
other hand, I don't intend to upgrade my remotely-located server box
(web, mail, amateur packet radio gateway) until a month or so after
potato is released.
You could try just installing libc6 2.1.2-10 and its dependencies, but
I understand that SOME binaries are not upwardly compatible with the
newer version.
Bob
--
Bob Nielsen Internet: nielsen@primenet.com
Tucson, AZ AMPRnet: w6swe@w6swe.ampr.org
DM42nh http://www.primenet.com/~nielsen
Reply to:
- References:
- glibc2.1
- From: Kenneth Scharf <scharkalvin@yahoo.com>