[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: magicfilter for Epson FX-80



Quoting David B. Karlin (funk48@travelin.com):
> Hello,
> I have a Panasonic (dot-matrix) printer which emulates an Epson FX-80,
> and is working fine as an FX-80 under Win95.
> 
> I'd like to install it on the Linux machine instead, but I've been unable to
> locate a magicfilter for Epson FX-80.
> 
> Does anyone know if such a filter exists, or know of some location where
> I can find it?

Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 16:50:37 +0100

Quoting Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira (baptista@cos.ufrj.br):
>         Hi Debian users,
>         I have an Epson LX-300 under Linux and cant it to work. Already tried
>         Magicfilter and Apsfilter. I dont know the right driver...
>         Thanks for any help,            Paulo Henrique

This is just a 9pin epson, I think. You might try magicfilter/gs-aladdin
with epson9 and if that works, try the eps9mid and eps9high variants.
>From my hacked epson9-filter files, respectively:

# PostScript
0 %! filter /usr/bin/gs -q -dSAFER -dNOPAUSE -r240x216 -sDEVICE=eps9mid -sOutputFile=\|"cat 1>&3" - 3>&1 1>&2 
0 \004%! filter /usr/bin/gs -q -dSAFER -dNOPAUSE -r240x216 -sDEVICE=eps9mid -sOutputFile=\|"cat 1>&3" - 3>&1 1>&2 

# PDF
0 %PDF fpipe /usr/bin/gs -q -dSAFER -dNOPAUSE -r240x216 -sDEVICE=eps9mid -sOutputFile=\|"cat 1>&3" $FILE 3>&1 1>&2 

and

# PostScript
0 %! filter /usr/bin/gs -q -dSAFER -dNOPAUSE -r240x216 -sDEVICE=eps9high -sOutputFile=\|"cat 1>&3" - 3>&1 1>&2 
0 \004%! filter /usr/bin/gs -q -dSAFER -dNOPAUSE -r240x216 -sDEVICE=eps9high -sOutputFile=\|"cat 1>&3" - 3>&1 1>&2 

If you try to get much better quality than that, it gets far too slow
(on an LX850).

Cheers,

-- 
Email:  d.wright@open.ac.uk   Tel: +44 1908 653 739  Fax: +44 1908 655 151
Snail:  David Wright, Earth Science Dept., Milton Keynes, England, MK7 6AA
Disclaimer:   These addresses are only for reaching me, and do not signify
official stationery. Views expressed here are either my own or plagiarised.


Reply to: