Re: what's the best html wordprocessor?
On Thu, Mar 18, 1999 at 10:01:40AM -0800, fockface dickmeat wrote:
> vi works best. There are few things worse than editing WSIWYG produced
> html.
>
>
> >From: George Bonser <grep@shorelink.com>
> >Reply-To: grep@oriole.sbay.org
> >To: Paul Puri <publisher@ompages.com>
> >CC: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> >Subject: Re: what's the best html wordprocessor?
> >Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 23:55:42 -0800 (PST)
> >
> >On Wed, 10 Mar 1999, Paul Puri wrote:
> >
> >> StarWriter is the best I've seen so far for Linux. The memory needs
> >> for this thing can be a bit too high for most users though. I can't
> >> wait to check out what the gnome word processor will do.
> >
> >Word perfect also has an html composer mode and I think LyX will allow
> you
> >to save as html.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> < /dev/null
> >
>
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
>
Here here! After using Frontpage for the first 2 months of making
web pages, I'm now happily using VIM and love it! One time, I
imported an excel table with Frontpage and the HTML file was 200+K.
Using search and replace and VIM, I got it down to 30K.
--
Stephen Pitts
smpitts@midsouth.rr.com
webmaster - http://www.mschess.org
Reply to: