Re: Beta-testing and the glibc 2.1 (Was: Missing ldd? Have libc6 on hold? Get ldso from slink...
- To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@pasteur.fr>
- Cc: Robert Woodcock <rcw@debian.org>, Edward Betts <edward@hairnet.demon.co.uk>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-user@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Beta-testing and the glibc 2.1 (Was: Missing ldd? Have libc6 on hold? Get ldso from slink...
- From: Stephen Crowley <crow@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 12:30:43 -0600
- Message-id: <[🔎] 19990317123043.A6074@stephenc.wf.net>
- Mail-followup-to: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@pasteur.fr>, Robert Woodcock <rcw@debian.org>, Edward Betts <edward@hairnet.demon.co.uk>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-user@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 199903171016.LAA21231@ezili.sis.pasteur.fr>; from Stephane Bortzmeyer on Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 11:16:18AM +0100
- References: <[🔎] 19990314165705.A802@frantica.rcw.oz.net> <[🔎] 199903171016.LAA21231@ezili.sis.pasteur.fr>
On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 11:16:18AM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Sunday 14 March 1999, at 16 h 57, the keyboard of Robert Woodcock
> <rcw@debian.org> wrote:
>
> > Those of you who are tracking unstable but are too chicken to install the
> > new glibc 2.1 may have noticed that your ldd has disappeared.
>
> May be these chickens are people who have some work to do. These sarcasms or
> those of Edward Betts will not convince people that Debian is a serious
> distribution, intended for real work.
>
If you need your machine for "real work" then you shouldn't be running
unstable.
--
Stephen Crowley
Debian GNU/Linux - http://www.debian.org
Reply to: