[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: IP_ALIAS (kernel 2.2.1)



I'd like to know more about this too.

NatePuri
Certified Law Student
& Debian GNU/Linux Monk
McGeorge School of Law
publisher@ompages.com
http://ompages.com

On Mon, 8 Mar 1999, Oz Dror wrote:

> Hi
> 
> I amgoing to have SDSL connected to my private network (192.168.0.x)
> I have 3com (3905b Net card). I would like to connect the SDSL to my local
> ethernet HUb. I will be assigned a fixe IP to comunicate with the world.
> 
> I compiled the kernel to support IP aliasing so that I could use the same
> ethernet card for the local network and the Global network having different
> IP for each network.
> 
> But when I type 
> ifconfig eth0:0 192.168.1.5 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255
> 
> I get the following error
> SIOCSIFADDR: Operation not supported by device
> SIOCSIFFLAGS: Operation not supported by device
> SIOCSIFNETMASK: Operation not supported by device
> SIOCSIFBRDADDR: Operation not supported by device
> SIOCSIFFLAGS: Operation not supported by device
> 
> When I type 
> ifconfig eth0:0
> 
> I get
> eth0:0    Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:10:5A:26:04:F1  
>           unspec addr:[NONE SET]  Bcast:[NONE SET]  Mask:[NONE SET]
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           Collisions:0 
>           Interrupt:10 Base address:0xa800 
> 
> this tels me that the card is recognized.
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 
> -- 
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> NAME   Oz Dror, Los Angeles, California   
> EMAIL  dror@earthlink.net                     <<Linux  since 8/15/94>>
> PHONE  Fax (310) 474-3126
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> 
>                     
> 
> 
> -- 
> Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
> 
> 


Reply to: