Re: bitchx (sucks!)
> [l] Help on Topic: index
> 4OP ABORT ADDIDLE ADDSHIT ADDUSER ADDLAME ADDFORWARD
> ADDWORD ADMIN AJOIN AJOINLIST AWAY BACK BAN
> BANS BANSTA BANTYPE BANWORD BEEP BK BOTLIST
> BYE C CD CDCC CHANNEL CHANST CHGAOP
> CHGCHAN CHGHOST CHANNEL CHANST CHGAOP CHGCHANCHGHOST
> CHGLEVEL CHGPROT CHOPS CLEARAUTO CLEARLOCK CLEARTAB CLONES
> CONNECT CMSG CREDIT CSAY CSET CTCP CWHO
> CWHOM CYCLE DESCRIBE DATE DBAN DC DCC
>
> Funny, looks alphabetized to me.
Man, "cwhom". Chgaop.... cghchanch... VERY INFORMATIVE. Alphabetical
sorting isn't enough, "help" should be helpful.
[inanity snipped]
> It was on dal.net and undernet, not efnet. I've not been on efnet in 5+
> years for other reasons. And in each case we were justified. When we get
> 20-30 people form the same country trying to clone us off a channel each
> week and maybe 1-2 "legit" users each month for maybe 10 minutes, well, you
> do the math.
You mean this sort of stupidity has invaded undernet too? Dalnet has
always been sort of off its head.
Regardless, the sensible thing to do would be to temporarily ban the
country, then undo it later. Channels tend to do things like banning entire
domains for years after an incident, which is simply ridiculous because it
inevitably leads to the problems mentioned by our newbie friend.
> See what you want, just know that you're more than likely 100% wrong.
I can only see what you project with your attitudes and behaviors.
"See you on the flip side"
- Steve Walsh (EfNet:#Babylon5:KnaraKat)
(swalsh@d.umn.edu)
Reply to: