Re: I can't believe this
Well I have to say that setting up ppp in debian was the easyist, of all
the Linux distros and any other OS I have installed.
*--* Mail: lawrence@otak-k.com
*--* Voice: 425.739.4247
*--* Fax: 425.827.9577
*--* HTTP://www.otak-k.com/~lawrence/
--------------------------------------
- - - - - - O t a k i n c . - - - - -
On Mon, 8 Mar 1999, Steve Lamb wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, 8 Mar 1999 09:52:46 -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> >> I think these criticisms are overstated in many cases. Ever try to get
> >> ppp running on Solaris? I have installed many distributions. The initial
> >> install is only a portion of the problem. The rest comes in getting the
> >> system configured the way that you need it. That is where Debian excels.
>
> >Yes, I have gotten Solaris's PPP configured and, yes it did suck
> >royally. But that's not the point, Debian does have short comings, and
> >poeple are aware of them. No matter how much they overstated it, we
> >need to address these issues.
>
> I personally don't think that the PPP setup needs work. I found it
> quite simple. So simple that the first time I set up Debian I missed it and
> feel like a complete putz.
>
> Windows PPP setup is harder because it is in several different and
> non-obvious places. Sure, Debian may have problems, but this isn't one of
> them.
>
> - --
> Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
> ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
> - -------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGPsdk version 1.0 (C) 1997 Pretty Good Privacy, Inc
>
> iQA/AwUBNuQ9gnpf7K2LbpnFEQIL0QCfe3wchfP4+wTeVSx6FEo4nk7YUGwAn0Cj
> N1LV3Mtqo1PHoAAZuDpQ5zTf
> =orQE
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
>
>
Reply to: