Re: dselect handling stable AND unstable [was Re: forcing dselect to downgrade]

To: Rick Macdonald <rickmacd@home.com>
Cc: grep@oriole.sbay.org, debian-user <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: dselect handling stable AND unstable [was Re: forcing dselect to downgrade]
From: George Bonser <grep@shorelink.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 22:25:35 -0800 (PST)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.990304222509.20554Q-100000@calvin.captech.com>
Reply-to: grep@oriole.sbay.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 36DF77DF.756EF484@home.com>

On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, Rick Macdonald wrote:

> Does it merge stable and unstable and just show the newest version of
> each package, 

Yes.

or keep them separate so I can choose?

No

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: dselect handling stable AND unstable [was Re: forcing dselect to downgrade]
  - From: Rick Macdonald <rickmacd@home.com>

References:
- Re: dselect handling stable AND unstable [was Re: forcing dselect to downgrade]
  - From: Rick Macdonald <rickmacd@home.com>

Prev by Date: Re: dselect handling stable AND unstable [was Re: forcing dselect to downgrade]
Next by Date: Problem Connecting to ISP
Previous by thread: Re: dselect handling stable AND unstable [was Re: forcing dselect to downgrade]
Next by thread: Re: dselect handling stable AND unstable [was Re: forcing dselect to downgrade]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread