Re: Upgrading to hamm
On Wed, Apr 15, 1998 at 10:39:40AM -0700, George Bonser wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Jeff Noxon wrote:
>
> > I have 2.0.33 running on an ABIT IT5H 2.0, K6-233 w/ 64 megs of RAM.
> > It's rock solid, but when I add another 64 megs, things start to segfault
> > all over the place. Is that a symptom of this problem? Should I switch
> > to 2.0.32 or 34pre? My K6 is one of the ">32M bug free" ones.
>
> Let me put it this way, booting a 2.0.32 kernel is a quick and easy way to
> rule .33 out, isnt it? Remember that you can have several different
> kernels on your system and select which one you want at boot-time.
>
> It would be consistant with .33's known memory corruption problems.
I'll try .32. The problems do not show up immediately, so I'm nervous to
try it... But what the heck! :) I did notice the system ran significantly
faster with 128M in it.
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: