On Mon, Apr 13, 1998 at 07:16:15AM -0700, Richard Sevenich wrote: > It appears that to pursue sgml in a free environment, authoring tools > are restricted to psgml via emacs or xemacs. Is there a preference with > respect to psgml? Further, is there a general preference in the selection > of xemacs vs. emacs? > Regards, Richard > Xemacs are a little more heavy but supports some really nice goodies like curses font in console mode, multi-size font in X mode (allowing full graphics supports) and lots of widget like buttons menus, etc... Lot of packets come already bundle in xemacs. Emacs are most... plain. The interface aren't that nice but you can choice more carefully the packages that you want in your emacs file. Although I prefer the more display of Xemacs, I often used Emacs if I have to do elisp development (because GNU-Emacs is the Original Emacs and the 'de facto' standard), or at job (I find Emacs for Windows more stable than XEmacs for Windows). -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Fabien Ninoles Running Debian/GNU Linux E-mail: fab@tzone.org WebPage: http://www.callisto.si.usherb.ca/~94246757 WorkStation [available when connected!]: http://nightbird.tzone.org/ RSA PGP KEY [E3723845]: 1C C1 4F A6 EE E5 4D 99 4F 80 2D 2D 1F 85 C1 70 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
pgpf_L_k7v99I.pgp
Description: PGP signature