Re: Couldn't get a free page

[Serge Delorme <sdelorme@autray.net>]

Yes, I am using 2.0.33 and I can say that my system is lightly loaded.
Since this only happens on forced check I can live with a reboot once in a
while...my previous system was win95 ;)

Thanks


> This is common with 2.0.33, is that the kernel version you are using?
> Also, just to make folks aware of the situation, I have gotten some really
> weird filesystem corruption with 2.0.33 that has (thankfully) always been
> corrected by a reboot but I really do not like rebooting these systems as
> I do not have physical access to them.  I have dropped back to 2.0.32 for
> all systems I maintain except the ones I have ready physical access to.
> It does not seem to be a problem on the lightly loaded systems, just the
> ones that are being pounded rather hard.

> BTW, there are constant reports of memory corruption and OOPSies on the
> kernel list for 2.0.33 with busy systems. The general rule of thumb is
> that unless there is some feature of 2.0.33 that you simply can not live
> without, use 2.0.32.

--
   ----------------------------------------------
   Serge Delorme (sdelorme@berthier.autray.net)
   Berthierville, Quebec
   Canada
   ABUSUS NON TOLLIT USUM
   ----------------------------------------------



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org