Re: Banco de Dados
- To: leo@opovo.com.br, "Eloy A. Paris" <eparis@ven.ra.rockwell.com>, Debian-User <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Banco de Dados
- From: Anthony Fok <foka@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca>
- Date: Fri, 3 Apr 1998 01:56:18 -0700
- Message-id: <19980403015618.58756@lovelife>
- In-reply-to: <351FD999.4BE0A3AC@opovo.com.br>; from Leonardo Ruoso on Mon, Mar 30, 1998 at 02:42:49PM -0300
- References: <351F9F60.BE4D7C5F@opovo.com.br> <6fogmn$au7$1@zeus.ven.ra.rockwell.com> <351FD999.4BE0A3AC@opovo.com.br>
On Mon, Mar 30, 1998 at 02:42:49PM -0300, Leonardo Ruoso wrote:
> I'm afraid about PostGreeSQL because it's not 100% ANSI SQL. We'll run
> third part apps that will expect to find a 100% compatible DB w/
> transactions.
PostgreSQL is as close to ANSI SQL 92 as you can get, and it is still
improving. Even though it may not be 100%, I would say it is at least
99.9%. Try it out before judging it. Afterall, it is *free*. :-)
> They recomend (obvius) Oracle 8. But it's no so cheap. And I've heard
> that the version for SCO runs SLOW. SCO version can run as well on Linux
> packages.
>
> Can I substitue the MS SQL Server by PostGreeSQl without re-writing
> code?
MS SQL Server???? [Anthony fainted...]
Please try out PostgreSQL first. It is full-featured and support
transactions, etc. You could also try MySQL, which is very fast, but
lacks some functionality in PostgreSQL.
PostgreSQL rivals Oracle 8 and MS SQL Server in functionality. It is
a professional RDBMS.
Go visit http://www.postgresql.org/. Read the site. Subscribe to their
mailing list. Ask questions. I'm sure there are lots of gurus there happy
to help you in your decision.
Cheers,
Anthony
--
Anthony Fok Tung-Ling Civil and Environmental Engineering
foka@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca University of Alberta, Canada
anthony_fok@catholic.org Keep smiling! *^_^*
Come visit Our Lady of Victory Camp -- http://olvc.home.ml.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: