[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ICQ for hamm?



On Tue, Nov 24, 1998 at 12:00:37AM +1100, Jiri Baum wrote:
> b) how much of slink would I have to download for it to work? (it needs a
> recent version of libc6 and a bunch of other things) (my modem is 9600) (is
> the current slink reasonably OK?)

    Depends on which one you grab.  There are actually several.  As for
slink, it has been quite stable, so far, IMO.  OTOH, it is only frozen so
things may change a little bit more, but generally for the better.
 
    At home my LAN is all tied into my Linux box which doesn't run any
single Debian distribution.  I built it on Hamm(Frozen) and have followed
the unstable tree since then.  So some parts are Hamm, some are Slink, some
are Potato.  The last time I made a change which required a reset (kernel
from the 2.0 series to the 2.1 series) I had a 60 day uptime.  After I got
it stable (took me a few days) it has been running happy ever since and is
currently at "up 15 days, 20:25".  As always, though, YMMV.

> c) how difficult would it be to set it up on the Win95 machine and use the
> Debian box to forward it to the Internet? (where would I find the relevant
> information?) (I don't use forwarding, just wwwoffle for the web)

    Not difficult at all.  Problem is since there is not ICQ ipmasqing
module incoming connections will always be refused.

-- 
             Steve C. Lamb             | Opinions expressed by me are not my
    http://www.calweb.com/~morpheus    | employer's.  They hired me for my
             ICQ: 5107343              | skills and labor, not my opinions!
---------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Attachment: pgpWbfFfd838L.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: