Re: Windoze 95 is not multi-tasking, it just pretends it is multitasking.

To: "C.J.LAWSON" <C.J.Lawson@Cranfield.ac.uk>
Cc: Carroll Kong <damascus@eden.rutgers.edu>, debian-user mailing list <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Windoze 95 is not multi-tasking, it just pretends it is multitasking.
From: Paul Miller <paul@3dillusion.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 1998 05:04:52 -0400 (EDT)
Message-id: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980420050203.2198A-100000@serv1.3dillusion.com>
In-reply-to: <Pine.OSF.3.95.980420145230.2297E-100000@paris.pegasus.cranfield.ac.uk>

On Mon, 20 Apr 1998, C.J.LAWSON wrote:

> > 	Windows 98 and NT require more ram to be faster than 95.  Otherwise,
> This is an issue that is dear to my heart ... I want my memory to be used
> /principally/ for my applications not gobbled up by my OS!
> 

I have 64 megs of ram in my Dell 200... and Windows 98 doesn't even
compare to the speed on 95...  even when openning the start menu, Win98
takes 5 to 10 seconds longer.. and browsing through my computer (in
Classic style) is also extremely slow...  KDE is much faster, but it needs
a lot of work..

-Paul

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Prev by Date: OUT OF TOPIC: squid and ftp
Next by Date: Re: Exim and procmail
Previous by thread: Re: Windoze 95 is not multi-tasking, it just pretends it is multitasking.
Next by thread: Free Linux
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread